Monday, April 23, 2007

Ever heard the saying, I couldn’t see the forest through the trees?

That’s sort of how I’m feeling right now. For months, my focus has been on finding an agent, signing with an agent, getting an agent to return my phone calls. Just kidding on that last one.

Seriously, though, my time and energy have been devoted to finding someone to represent me for a very long time. What if that isn’t God’s will for me? What if I’ve been so blinded by what I perceived as the next step, that I’ve been missing the steps God would have me to take? And how do I know when I’ve come to that place?

I think it has to do with something I learned a long time ago. All things happen in God’s own time, regardless of how I try to rush them, or how I try to circumvent God’s program. When I thought my writing was strong enough to win a contest, God said not yet. When I thought I was ready to publish, God said not yet. Those things came, but not in my time—they came in His. So, perhaps God’s answer to whether or not I find an agent is not ‘no.’ It’s simply, not yet.

I’m trying to be patient, God. Really.

Monday, April 16, 2007


Meet Kelly Mortimer, of the Mortimer Literary Agency. Kelly, thank you for being here. Let’s start by telling people how many proposals you receive in week:

Kelly: Haven’t you heard? I’m not accepting queries at this time. Strange, it seems you’re not the only one who hasn’t heard. I got so snowed under with queries, a St. Bernard couldn’t have found me—and I could’ve used the Brandy! I became an agent because I felt there were great authors out there, and not enough agents to represent them. I was correct. Unfortunately, I can't represent them all. I can do the work of three people, but only three. How’s that for taking a paragraph and not answering your question? I have specific guidelines on my Web site. There are only a select few ways I’ll accept a query right now. With those, plus the rogues who disregard the rules, I get about ten a week. Not too bad, but it’s still 40 a month, which adds up if you’re not supposed to be accepting queries. And being the soft-hearted gal that I am (don't believe those other things you hear...), I try to give everyone a chance, so most get a request.

EL: Can you tell me what kind of things you look for in a proposal?

Kelly: I can tell you, but then I’d haveta kill you.... Sorry, couldn't help it. My fingers have a will of their own. Seriously, in a query letter, I look for the genre/sub-genre, the word count, the author’s credits, and contest placements. Your next thought is, “That can't be right. What about plot, conflict, and characters?” I work differently than some agents; I have my reasons. Truth is, no matter how great a query reads, it doesn't usually translate into a great manuscript. I’m not even looking to evaluate a manuscript, but an author. Does the writer work in a genre I represent? Do I already have enough authors in that category? Has the writer ever sold a short story? Article? Anything to show me someone thinks their work is publishable. The word count tells me where I can sell the manuscript, and the contest info can hurt or help.

I know how hard it is to final in a contest, but things are changing. Being a final round judge in several contests, I know some of the material I’ve read isn’t publishable. There are so many contests now, the competition isn’t as stiff as it once was. The ultimate goal in entering a contest is to snag an editor or agent. If the manuscript has finaled in 10 contests, but nobody’s bought it or offered to represent the author, what does that tell me? The first three chapters are hot, and the rest has problems. I know the business is subjective, but at some point if a manuscript is that good, someone will want it. A few wins in the more major contests like the Golden Heart and the Genesis, or non-RWA National contests is better than finaling in a dozen smaller ones.

If I ask for a proposal, it’ll be the prologue (if applicable) and the first chapter, plus a short synopsis. If I don't like the work enough to represent the author, I know it right away. Why do I only ask for one chapter instead of three? The plot never falls apart by chapter three, and if I want the full, by the time I receive it I forget what I’ve previously read and have to start all over again. I figured I might as well re-read one chapter instead of three. If I ask for the full, I’ll want a complete marketing plan. As Jerry Maguire said, “Help me, to help you!” In this competitive market where more doors are closed to first-time authors than ever before, the writer needs to show the editor what they’re willing to do to help sell the book.

EL: On the average, how many new clients do you take on in a year?

Kelly: I evaluate very carefully, as I’m more of a partner than an agent. Each clients’ manuscripts get complete line edits, and that takes time. I’ve never read a manuscript that was completely error-free. I catch things, some small, some big, but every edge you can get, you need to take. The editors I submit to know I’ve gone over the manuscript, and it’ll be clean because I have more at stake than an agent who’s sent a client to a paid editor. Most agents don't have the time or inclination to edit. I think of this business as a war. Each client is different, and each needs their own battle plan. But one thing always holds true. A person fighting for their own country or beliefs is worth three mercenaries. I know, TMI! I’d do a terrible job on a lie-detector test. Can you imagine me giving a yes or no answer?! Actually, I have taken one. Off the track again.... There’s no reasonable answer. I might find one client in four months, or four in one month. But I have to stagger them, as I want each to get my full attention. I’ll know when I have more than I can properly care for, and then I’ll stop until other clients don't need as much of my time.

EL: What are the biggest reasons for rejecting a manuscript?

Kelly: I’m having a bad day. Okay, I have a lot of bad days, but that isn't the real reason. This one’s simple: The writing isn't good enough. Most manuscripts either need too much editing, or the manuscript (plot, characters) aren’t original enough. I’ve taken on a few authors who have great potential, but need some guidance in the editing area, but most writers submit way before they’re ready.

EL: What is the one thing you wish more authors did?

Kelly: Come on, I gotta pick one? Sheesh. Okay. I wish more authors would realize that agents are people just like writers. We have families, lives, and insecurities (well, some of us do...). We don't wanna hurt anyone’s feelings, and we’d love to say yes to everyone. We can't, and it’s nothing personal. What do I wish they’d do? Give a simple thank you, take any comments meant to help them with grace, and still like me as much as I like them, even if I have to pass. I know, dare to dream!

EL: Awesome feedback, Kelly. Thank you so much for taking the time to be interviewed.

Want to know more? Check out Kelly’s website at http://www.mortimerliterary.com

Monday, April 09, 2007

Is it any wonder that editors and agents, people who work so closely together, are all looking for the same thing when it comes to their authors? Yet, with all their similarities, there are a few things that set them apart. Compatibility, for example. Agents are very concerned with finding clients with whom they are compatible.

So what are agents looking for?

Just like an editor, agents want to see quality manuscripts with strong writing technique and unique voice. Kristen Nelson suggests if you are a struggling-to-publish writer, honing your voice should be your top priority. A difficult task, but one in which a critique group can prove invaluable.

They also want to have an in-depth marketing strategy to be able to show to publishers, and they want a highly marketable author with varied skills. Deidre Knight of The Knight Agency suggests writing a sharp, succinct cover letter attached to your very best material. That’s not all that much to ask, is it?

Agent Janet Kobobel Grant offers a whole list of things she looks for when deciding whether or not to take on a client (used with permission):

Here’s what I weigh when I make that decision, but I have to say the criteria will vary from agent to agent, but this will give you an idea of how to present yourself.

I ask:

  • Has the person published before? How many books? With which publishers? What were the sales figures?
  • Did the person come to me through a recommendation? Who made the recommendation?
  • What kind of publishing future might this person have? Is his or her writing strong? Does it stand out from the crowd? Are the ideas creative and marketable? Would the writing have broad appeal or would it have strong appeal to a select but significant audience?
  • Would a number of publishers be interested in the proposal I’m reading or just one publisher?
  • Is this someone I’d like to work with?
  • Do I feel excitement when I read this proposal? In publishing, you’ll find that editors, agents, and yes, even publishers listen to what their instincts tell them about a project. Those who have good instincts are described as having “The Golden Gut”—their “stomach” tells them this is something new, exciting, and very sales-worthy.

For me, I don’t have to answer thumbs up to all the above questions to decide to represent someone. Sometimes yes to just two of those questions can cause me to decide to represent someone. I listen to my intuition.

Your goal, as a writer, is to give an agent every reason to say yes to you and no reason to say no.

Most agents list their particular submission guidelines and what they are looking for on their website or blog. Be sure check them out before you submit. Above all, agents agree, maintain a high level of professionalism. Publishing is a business. Treat it as such.


Okay, so I know what they’re looking for. Now, if I could just get one to sign me.

Next week, I'll post an interview with Kelly Mortimer of the Mortimer Literary Agency. Kelly offers particular insight into the do's and don'ts of finding an agent, so be sure to stop by.

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Hard as I’ve tried, I’ve yet to find that one person who will become my partner, my supporter, my helper. I’m talking about an agent of course. What did you think?

It all started seven years ago, the day I decided I wanted to write. I set out looking for a publisher, but gradually my focus changed and I realized that having an agent could prove to very valuable in an industry that increasingly becomes more and more competitive. So, what exactly can an agent do for you?

1. Good agents keep their finger on the pulse of the publishing industry. They know what’s selling and who’s buying.

2. Good agents will champion your work and pitch it to the right houses—houses that fit your style and voice.

3. Good agents keep you motivated, help and encourage you, offer criticism and ideas when necessary, and advise you on projects that may or may not fit the current market.

All that said, why is it so difficult to get an agent? I’ve sold a book. . .you’d think this part would be easy. Truth is there are a lot of writers out there and very few agents. Signing with one can be almost as hard as landing a contract. So starting next week, I’m going to bring you along on my journey of finding the right agent for me. I’ll start by telling you what I’ve discovered as far as what agents look for, and their most common reasons for rejecting a manuscript. After that, I’ll post an interview with Kelly Mortimer, of Mortimer Literary Agency.

So come along! Maybe we can find that elusive agent together.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Being a freelance editor has afforded me ample opportunities to see the kind of mistakes new and aspiring authors make—some not so serious, some fatal.

What do I mean by fatal? These are the kind of mistakes that get your manuscript rejected. So, in an effort to help you steer clear of the rejection pile, I’m going to list a few of the more common errors, along with a few helpful hints on how you can avoid making them again and again.

The biggest mistake I see involves Point of View (POV for short). New authors, especially, make the mistake of thinking their writing should emulate what they see on T.V.—scenes hopping from one to the next, jumping from one character’s viewpoint to another, sometimes in the same paragraph, etc. In a nutshell, POV is what one character thinks, feels, sees, hears, and smells. A general rule of thumb is to stay inside one character’s POV for the duration of a scene, only changing into a different POV after you have inserted a section or chapter break. After each paragraph ask yourself, is something my POV character can physically know or think? If the answer is no, check for a POV slip. Editors want to know that you have a firm grasp and understanding of POV.

Plot and structure holes are the second most common error I see. Think of your favorite movie. What did you like about it? Most likely, it involved a main character who sets out to achieve one major event or goal. Many things happen along the way, but the goal remains the same. From start to finish, the viewer is left wondering whether or not the main character will accomplish their goal. Take, for example, one of my favorite movies, The Princess Bride. In it, two characters, a boy and a girl, are separated from each other by circumstances neither of them can control. From the point of their separation on, the viewer wonders if they will somehow find their way back to each other. Events strive to keep them apart, but always, they struggle to come back together until the film’s final resolution.

Plotting is a difficult concept to grasp, which is why having a timeline is so beneficial. Before you even begin writing, I suggest you sit down and write yourself a detailed timeline, always keeping in mind who your main character is and what they hope to accomplish. This way, your story never strays far from the original plot.

A third major problem is the use of passive voice as opposed to active voice. Passive voice involves past tense and the main character viewing or observing events as they happen. Active voice is more immediate and involves the main character actually doing or saying something. Editors watch for the use of active voice, which is why grasping this concept is so important. Key word indicators to passive voice are ‘was’ and ‘had’ in all of their forms. Look at the following example:

Passive: She was glad to see him.
Active: She squealed with delight at the sight of him.

Both examples say she is happy to see him, but one involves immediacy and action.

Lastly, be sure to check your manuscript for things like word/phrase repetition, use of adverbs (or ly words, as I like to say), and incorrect punctuation and grammar before sending it in. Mechanics are importing in your writing, and editors want to know that you’ve taken the time to learn basic technique before they go deeper to check for a good story with a strong plot. If you’re not certain on the rules, invest in a good book—the Chicago Manual of Style for example, or Kathy Ide’s, Polishing the PUG’s.

You might even consider hiring someone to edit your book for you (what kind of freelancer would I be if I didn’t throw that in?) :-)

Seriously folks, as someone who has reaped the benefits of having my work professionally edited, I can tell you the things you will learn far outweigh the cost, and you’ll be able to take those tools with you and apply them to every future work.

So that’s it! Have fun, and start editing.

Monday, March 19, 2007

The buzz is back.

ACFW’s annual conference, held in Dallas, Texas, is gearing up to be bigger and better than ever. Already authors, presenters, and speakers are lining up to hear and be heard at one of the premier events in the publishing industry. Why? It’s simple. Mathematics.

Since its inception, ACFW has more than doubled in sheer size and numbers. Drawn by the possibility of meeting editors and publishers face-to-face, authors have flocked to ACFW by the hundreds. And ACFW has lived up to its end of the bargain.

This year, more agents and editors than ever have agreed to set up shop for one weekend in September. They are going all out to meet with aspiring authors across the table. As if that weren’t enough, ACFW is offering hours of educational workshops and clinics, spearheaded by keynote speaker, James Scott Bell.

The cost of the conference has gone up in recent years, but once again I’m looking forward to packing my bags and heading for Dallas. After all, it’s the experience that’s important!

Friday, March 09, 2007

Even writers need to get away sometimes. This year, it'll be to the mountains of Colorado.

I've planned a little family vacation, but truly, I'm the one needing the rest. How wonderful it'll be to have no Internet connection, no email capability, and no time frame in which to rush around. Among the things that troubles me most, exhaustion has to be key. My creativity is stifled when my mind is tired. That's why I'm looking forward to hiding myself in the shadow of God's beauty, refreshing in the crisp air of Colorado. I plan on spending a lot of time in front of a roaring fire with only my word processor to keep me company.

I hope you'll find time to get away this year. May your week be blessed.

Newsletter Subscribe

* indicates required
Email Format

Followers

Powered by Blogger.

Historical Romantic Suspense

Historical Romance

Popular Posts

Recent Posts